在宅 > ニュース > 企業ニュース > The revival of American isolationism
ニュース
デイリー·ニュース
業界ニュース
企業ニュース
認証

古代中国では愛のギフト

翡翠ペンダント 彼らは簡単にどこでもそれを取ることができるように、古代中国では通常、愛好家の小さな何かを与えました。ヒスイのペンダントは良い選択です。...

低炭素鋼とは何ですか?

低炭素鋼は炭素含有量の低い炭素鋼で、低炭素鋼としても知られています。その範囲は供給源ごとに異なるが、炭素質炭素は典型的に0.05重量%〜0.25重量%の炭素含...

ビジネスマンと起業家の違い

ビジネスマンと起業家の違い ビジネスマンと起業家は多くの類似点を持っています。しかし、彼らは同じ種類の人ではありません。 1.アイデアのオリジナリティに...

ALOCROM 1200表面処理とは何ですか?

ALOCROM 1200とは何ですか?表面処理 Alocrom 1200は急速です腐食に対する優れた保護を与える無電解浸漬法塗装されていないアルミニウムの表面に塗装されていま...

Kydexの資料とは

Kydexとは材料 Kydexは熱可塑性樹脂のラインですSekisui SPI社製のアクリル - ポリ塩化ビニル材料である。それは広い航空機の隔壁、銃器ホルスター、シース、ナ...

オーバーモールドとは何ですか?

Overmoldingは中国で2回の射出成形とも呼ばれています。オーバーモールドプロセスは、サードパーティの材料接合と比較して、プロセスをより迅速かつコスト効率よ...

Alodine 5200表面処理とは何ですか?

Alodine 5200とは何ですか?表面処理 Alodine 5200処理はクロムアルミニウムおよびその合金の処理のために特別に配合されている。スプレーまたは浸漬塗布を使用...

酸化黒とは何ですか?

黒色酸化物、黒色化、酸化、酸化、黒色不動態化、ガンブルー。 。 。これらの用語はすべて、鉄金属の表面上に黒色酸化鉄を形成するプロセスを指す。 黒色酸化物...

プライバシーポリシー

私たちはあなたの情報を収集して任意の形式で保存しません。

シートメタルパーツにベンドリリーフをどのように追加するか

曲がりの救済とは何ですか? ベンドレリーフとは、2つの小さな切開が板金に切り込まれて、2つの間に金属を解放します。それはあなたが折りたたることができる素...
お問い合わせ
副総支配人:アイビー
Tel:86-13312953695
Tel:86-755-82737317 / 82737469
ファックス:86-755-82737710
電子メール:販売。 china@xy-global.com
郵便番号:518129
Off Add:Room1702,17F、Building#4、Tianan Cloud Park、No.2018 Xuegang Rd。、Longgang District、Shenzhen。
工場は加えます:大連工業区、Shaling、Fenggang町、東莞市 今コンタクトしてください

The revival of American isolationism

The revival of American isolationism

naky www.diecastingpartsupplier.com 2016-02-25 17:30:10
Why is the Middle East in flames and Russia on the rampage? In both Europe and the Middle East, it is common to hear the blame placed on Barack Obama. The US president, it is charged, is a weak and disengaged leader who has allowed international events to get out of control. Many Americans — both liberals and conservatives — make the same accusation. Sarah Palin, darling of the American right, has called Mr Obama “capitulator-in-chief”. Roger Cohen, a New York Times columnist, has blamed Syria’s agony on the “fecklessness and purposelessness” of the Obama administration.

Even if Mr Trump and Mr Sanders never get close to the White House, the popularity of their campaigns, and their influence on the more mainstream candidates, suggests that there is now a strong constituency in the US for a retreat from globalism: repudiating international military and economic commitments.
The inherent isolationism in Mr Trump’s thinking can be disguised by his chest-thumping rhetoric about rebuilding the military and getting tough with foreigners. But it is no accident that his signature initiative is to build a gigantic wall along America’s southern border. Mr Trump’s economic rhetoric is all about shutting out the world. He is the most explicitly protectionist candidate in the field, promising, for example, to make sure that Americans buy US-made cars and machinery, not Japanese imports. He denounces the trade deals that the US has signed as bad for America and has pledged to rip them up.

Mr Trump takes a similarly mercantilist attitude to security, promising to force South Korea and Japan to pay for America’s military protection. The implication is that there is no inherent US national interest in underwriting the security of the Asia-Pacific region. That logic, taken to its obvious conclusion, would be a formula for America pulling back from its security commitments all over the world.

Mr Trump is also a frank admirer of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, calling him a “strong leader” and basking in Mr Putin’s praise. In a recent Republican debate, all the presidential candidates queued up to denounce Mr Obama for not crushing the jihadis of Isis, but none mentioned Russia’s intervention in Syria. As a foreign policy “realist” and self-proclaimed dealmaker, Mr Trump would undoubtedly be attracted to granting President Putin his longed-for Russian “sphere of influence” in eastern Europe. And once that is done, why not cut a similar deal in East Asia with Xi Jinping of China, another tough-guy foreign leader who Mr Trump openly admires?

Together, Mr Trump and Mr Sanders are capitalising on growing American disillusionment with globalisation. The living standards of middle-income Americans have been under pressure for decades, and foreigners and an internationally connected elite are easy scapegoats. Both the far right and the hard left in America are now promising a retreat from globalisation. But any such retreat would have profound consequences, not just for the international economy, but for America’s role as the world’s most powerful nation.

Of course, both Mr Sanders and Mr Trump are still a long way from the White House. The bookmakers’ favourite to be the next president remains Hillary Clinton. And yet, even Mrs Clinton has had to respond to the new public mood. Last week, she adopted Mr Sanders’ claim that the economy is “rigged” in favour of a privileged elite.

But the current course of the presidential election suggests that it would be foolhardy to dismiss the chances of either Mr Trump or Mr Sanders actually winning their parties’ nominations and, ultimately, the presidency.

If that were to happen, the commentators who are currently bemoaning the “weakness” and “fecklessness” of President Obama would come to realise that, in fact, he might be the last in a line of serious and committed internationalists to occupy the Oval Office.